this house believes keeping animal as a pets is banned... okey... that's motion... but the big topic is 'bout animal right.. yeah... i am the closing oppotition... i think it's easy problem.... ehm,,ehm.... okey... start from the opening government... they say that keeping animal as a pets is should be banned..... cos the animal have to live in world life... ehm,, so my friend ask 'bout hunter... but they can't answer her question... okey,,, one point to my team... i think that we can make them lose... yeah...... then,,, the opening oppotition say that pets can make us happy,,, etc.... then,,, the opening government deny them directly... cos it's 'bout animal right not human right... okey.... that's enough... I thought I could win this race ... because I said that we should not prohibit a person to keep animals as pets,,, for what? " because they serve as a communications medium for parents to communicate with their children ... and if parents keep animals as pets, parents can tell the children that animals are our friends, they need to be kept and maintained ... so, when the children mature, they will understand that animals are friends and as friends, animals must be protected ... so there is no longer the hunter ... closing government also said that we should forbid the maintenance of the animals because there is a toddler who died from their pets ... and I managed to argue with them ... I said that it was a mistake because the parents of the toddler toddlers and pets do not know anything ... as more people understand,,, more parents should keep their babies .. and closing government also can't answer my friend's question 'bout "can you guarantee there's no deases in worldlife?' but they not answer that.... but why they become a winner ???? hikz... hikz.... hikz... i'm regret.......
